What Stands for Menstrual (In)justice - International Workshop at Union University Law School Belgrade

MENST

On 22 November 2024, the Union University Law School Belgrade will hold an international workshop entitled 

What Stands for Menstrual (In)justice.

The Belgrade workshop serves to revisit the topics of human rights, social justice, law, and menstruation in relation to women’s health, public health, tax law and policy, labor rights, LBGTQI right, psychology, sociology, health, and feminism. 

“Les atteintes aux libertés individuelles au nom de la santé publique - Panorama international”

RUIB

12- 13 December, 2024

Cour de cassation

Paris

RUIB Workshop

https://ruib.univ-rennes.fr/

Created in 2006, the aim of the Network is to promote international and multidisciplinary research on questions of biomedical ethics. The focus is bioethics.

 

Workshop international

“Les atteintes aux libertés individuelles au nom de la santé publique - Panorama international”

The Covid Pandemic in Hungary: Lessons from a Human Rights Perspective - chapter by Judit Sándor

November 4, 2024
Decorative image

We’re pleased to announce the open-access release of Ethical Issues of the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in East-Central Europe and Beyond, edited by Assya Pascalev and Gergely Tari.

Judit Sándor contributes an insightful chapter on Hungary's pandemic response from a human rights perspective, highlighting the impact of public health measures on individual freedoms.

Access her work and the full volume here.

Legal epidemiology and the future of policy evaluation research

September 23, 2024
Decorative image
We are glad to share the next lecture in our LEVIATHAN Lecture Series, organized by the Center for Ethics and Law in Biomedicine at Central European University Vienna/Budapest.

"Legal epidemiology and the future of policy evaluation research"

Date: October 7, 2024 (Monday)
Time: 2 pm CET
Venue: Quantum Room, CEU Budapest, 1051 Nádor utca 15.

CASE OF DÁNIEL KARSAI v. HUNGARY (Application no. 32312/23)

June 13, 2024
Decorative image

Today the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights held by 6 votes to 1, that there had been no violation of Article 8 of the Convention taken alone and also by 6 votes to 1, that there had been no violation of Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention. Only Judge Felici delivered his dissent opinion by citing Dworkin.